Logan heckled over leader’s expenses query

editorial image

The 34 elected members of Scottish Borders Council receive around £80,000 in travel expenses each year.

And a monthly update of each item of such expenditure – every journey, every mileage claim – is published on the council’s website under the names of 33 of these councillors.

The one exception is 
David Parker, the leader of the council.

At last week’s full council meeting, Conservative opposition councillor Gavin Logan incurred the wrath of some members of Mr Parker’s ruling administration by demanding to know, in a written question, why the leader’s expenses were not itemised online for public scrutiny.

A clearly annoyed Mr Parker said he was disappointed Mr Logan had made no attempt to contact officers of the council before submitting his question.

“I have been advised it is debateable whether I require to answer this question, as it may not be competent under Standing Orders,” said Mr Parker.

“However, in a spirit of openness and transparency, I am happy to do so.”

His demeanour, however, suggested he was far from happy.

“Councillors’ expenses claim forms are published on the website,” said Mr Parker.

“In fact, I make no claims directly, so therefore have no claim forms to publish.

“As you may have noticed, I am visually impaired and, because of my disability, particular arrangements require to be made to allow me to undertake my duties.

“These, of course, constitute reasonable adjustments in terms of the Equality Act.

“Therefore, staff are made available to drive me to meetings and I use taxis where appropriate. Neither of these require me to submit a claim form.

“These costs are properly accounted for and are included in the annual report to council on members’ expenses.”

Mr Logan appeared unbowed by cries of “shame” and “disgrace” from the administration benches as he rose to respond.

“The fact is that I must declare and have published every journey I make, and I think the same rule should apply to everyone, including you, Mr Parker,” said Mr Logan.

After the meeting, Mr Logan was unrepentant.

“The fact is that I did make an attempt to consult officers before submitting my question and was told that a taxi company sent in regular invoices in respect of Mr Parker’s journeys, so the information is out there, it’s just not made public,” he said.