The most suitable company structure for your business will depend on the importance you place on a number of commercial, tax and legal factors.
A requirement for limited liability may outweigh all other considerations, particularly if your trading activity is one which may be vulnerable to claims or liabilities. The risks of one trade could affect the viability of the others.
This type of concern would point to the use of separate parallel operating companies, or a group structure.
Operating trading companies in parallel gives protection from risk and gives flexibility of allowing management responsibility of the individual business to be reflected in the respective shareholdings.
If one of the trades is likely to be sold and the intention is to extract the funds into the hands of shareholders, the potential availability of entrepreneur’s relief for Capital Gains Tax, bringing the rate payable down to 10 per cent, could be attractive.
A group structure, comprising a holding company and trading subsidiaries, may also be attractive in giving protection from risk and also tax advantages. Disposal of a single trading subsidiary may be tax free if qualifying criteria are met and the intent is simply to reinvest the proceeds in ongoing trading, by expansion or reducing borrowing.
If one trade is making losses, a group structure can facilitate offset of losses between companies. It is also possible for a subsidiary to move cash or profits up to a holding company by payment of a dividend, which is not taxable in the hands of the holding company. Tax charges will only arise when the cash is distributed to the shareholders of the holding company.
For further assistance with this or other tax matters, Mark Thompson of Rennie Welch LLP can be contacted on email@example.com or 01573 224391.