DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
  • 20/06/13
  • 11°C to 20°C Sunny spells
  • Selkirk 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Friday 21 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High18°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From South

    Speed12 mph

    Saturday 22 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed20 mph

    Sunday 23 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed15 mph

    Monday 24 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed14 mph

    Tuesday 25 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed13 mph

  • Like Us
  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

BGH ambulance station appeal

THE Scottish Ambulance Service (SAS) has claimed its plans for an ambulance station at the Borders General Hospital site would increase the chances of patient survival by up to a fifth, writes Kenny Paterson.

SAS has appealed to the Scottish Government after the council’s planning committee rejected its bid for a new station at land north-west of the hospital, named site A, in November.

Councillors based their ruling on concerns about the removal of important woodland and access to the Melrose bypass, arguing that a site (F) beside Huntlyburn House in the BGH’s grounds would provide faster response times.

But an SAS spokesman said the use of Optima, hi-tech software package, had shown site A would prove quicker for paramedic crews to attend emergencies than site F.

He claimed the difference would be 19 seconds for Borders-wide call-outs and 25 seconds faster for incidents in Galashiels. The new station is due to replace the ageing depot at the town’s Roxburgh Street.

The spokesman added: “In real terms, SAS’s review of Optima’s findings affirms that site F would result in a reduction of a patient’s chance of survival by 14-20 per cent, notwithstanding resultant safety issues associated with the adjoining nursery use.”

SAS also argued that council landscape architect Jim Knight was wrong to say site A would have an impact on the national scenic area (NSA), which includes the nearby Eildon Hills.

The spokesman added: “The site, through retention of an 8-10m woodland belt around the site, does not adversely impact the national scenic area with the expert statutory consultee, Scottish National Heritage, through its assessment, saying: ‘The proposal will not have 
an adverse effect on the 
integrity of the NSA or the qualities for which it has been designated’.”

A Scottish Borders Council spokesman said ambulance chiefs’ decision to appeal was “extremely regrettable”.

He added: “Whilst it remains sympathetic to the desire of the ambulance service to establish a new site, the council remains of the view that better sites exist and will therefore be seeking to defend its decision robustly through the appeal 
process.”

As well as quicker response times – with SAS only reaching 62 per cent of life-threatening calls within its eight minute target from its Galashiels station – the move to the BGH would also allow NHS Borders to build its new £1.8million Roxburgh Street health centre in the forthcoming financial year.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page