Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Southern Reporter site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'The fact so many faced death, yet no life was lost, will always be a miracle'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 August 2008
HEAVY rain has again threatened to flood many areas of the Borders – but so far major damage has been averted.
Selkirk Rugby Club became a victim for the third time in recent years, and a campsite at Coldstream had to be evacuated when the Leet burst its banks during the town's civic week celebrations.

Watchful eyes continue to monitor the situation as forecasters continue to issue alerts.

During one alert on Tuesday into Wednesday this week police and council staff put contingency plans into operation. Overnight rain was recorded at around 13cms – Fife was less lucky. The Kingdom was hit by around 33cm swamping areas around Glenrothes and Freuchie.

But what is currently happening almost pales into insignificance compared to what happened in the Borders 60 years ago this week.

Over 24 hours during August 11 and 12 – after six days of rain – came what was to be known as the Great Flood. It affected all four Border counties and north Northumberland – but it was Berwickhire that took the brunt.

Flood water gathered from 2,000 square miles of the Tweed's catchment area converged on the Borders' most easterly – and low lying – county.

It left houses, farms and mills under feet of water. Families fled or were evacuated. More than 40 bridges were either swept away or rendered unsafe. Roads became rivers and rail routes were cut off.

And a massive loch a mile long and 28ft deep, containing around 400million gallons of water, threatened to breach a railway embankment and swamp areas of Eyemouth. It took until August 29 before this threat was removed.

It proved almost impossible to calculate the financial cost of the this flood. But in Berwickshire alone the figure was put at around £2million – that's around £40million at today's prices.

Amazingly, while livestock were swept to their deaths there was no loss of human life.

Weather experts declared it to be the second worst rainstorm ever recorded in the UK – falling just behind the Norfolk floods of August 26, 1912, in which many lives were lost.

By August 11 a weather depression was slowly moving across Britain. Four inches of rain fell during that day in the Borders. The 12th brought continued deluges. The River Tweed was measured at 17ft above its normal levels.

The full article contains 395 words and appears in Southern Reporter newspaper.
Page 1 of 3

  • Last Updated: 13 August 2008 4:50 PM
  • Source: Southern Reporter
  • Location: Borders
 
Prev
1
Next
1

gurkareiver,

Forfar 15/08/2008 01:07:32
How can it be possible that the Borders Regional Council can have done nothing about preventing floods for so many years. I can remember the Gurkhas having to give assistance in the '80's, building bridges etc. and BRC promised then to get it sorted and not have that sort of thing happen again. People in the Borders really need to wake up and start using their voice and votes to make these people be accountable. No point moaning about it later, phone them or write a letter or e-mail them all the time 'till they do something.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.