Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Southern Reporter site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Parents cry foul over school bus seat belt 'inconsistency'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 May 2008
A BUS operator has described as "inconsistent and impractical" a new policy which demands that vehicles used on designated school contracts are at all times fitted with seat belts.
Munro's of Jedburgh fell foul of the edict from Scottish Borders Council last month when it was forced to use a large service bus to convey around 20 children from Lanton to Ancrum Primary School, via the busy A698 and A68 roads.

The normal 29-sea
ter, which is fully fitted with seat belts and booster seats, had been taken off the road while it was prepared for an MOT test.

There is some dispute about how long the situation, which caused consternation at last week's meeting of Ancrum Parent Council, lasted.

One member of that forum claimed the service bus, which had no seat belts, was in action for 10 days, the specialised vehicle being brought back into service for a day and then removed again.

But Ewan Farrish of Munro's said the 29-seater was only out of commission for "a couple of days" and that the scenario could not have been avoided.

He admitted his firm had been contacted by SBC and told that, in future, a seat-belted vehicle must always be used on the contract.

"This is almost impossible to guarantee," said Mr Farrish. "We have 34 vehicles operating a variety of contracts including public services, and two spare buses to cover for breakdowns, MOTs and the like."

He added: "When this policy was introduced, we dismissed the notion of fitting seat belts on all those vehicles not already equipped. If there was an accident, the belts would simply come away from their moorings and could be even more dangerous.

"To buy vehicles already fitted with seat belts by the manufacturer would have huge cost implications for us and would undoubtedly put up the price of school contracts. At the end of the day, we fulfilled our obligation to get the children to school safely.

"This was a highly unusual situation and I think a mountain is being made out of a molehill by some parents."

The parent-council member who lives in Lanton but does not wish to be named said it was only natural that parents were very concerned about an inappropriate vehicle taking children as young as five to Ancrum.

"I know taxis and private hire vehicle contracted to carry schoolchildren have to meet rigorous regulations about seat belts, disabled access and raised seats," they said. "Yet that does not seem to apply to other operators and I think the policy is a nonsense."

Another Lanton parent sympathised with the bus company and acknowledged it had been "polite and caring" when she contacted them.



The full article contains 459 words and appears in Southern Reporter newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 08 May 2008 10:13 AM
  • Source: Southern Reporter
  • Location: Borders
 
Prev
1
Next
1

FFOC Teribus,

Hawick 08/05/2008 19:23:28
What a big fuss over nothing!

I do understand the basic principle of where the Lanton residents are coming from, seat belts ARE a very good safety device and have been proven time and time again to save lives.

And Munros, a small locally based bus operation, have provided a fully seatbelted vehicle for use on school contracts in the area, no mean feat for such a small operation.

But everyone needs to be sympathetic to the operation needs of these vehicles. As pointed out by the article, the vehicle has to be off the road annually for a small period of time for MOT preparation, as well as being off service for regular safety inspections as per the rules set out by VOSA. You cannot expect ANY vehicle to be in commission 24/7, 365 days a year.

For any bus operator to provide a further seatbelted vehicle simply for covering school contracts would mean the cost of purchasing another vehicle, then there's the cost of seatbelting that vehicle (typically in the region of £5,000 to £10,000 per vehicle), and on top of that they need to pay for the upkeep of another vehicle (i.e. maintainence costs, road tax, operation costs, insurance costs, and so on). The costs of which will need to be made up somewhere along the line, be it higher costs to the council to fulfill the contract, or higher costs passed to service bus passengers.

I used to travel by bus to school, and not once did I set foot on a bus with seat belts. And this has been in the last decade, we're not talking many moons ago. Seat Belts were never a concern for parents back then. All that mattered was that the children made it to and from school.

And let's not forget one final point. Yes, it's the responsibility of a driver to ensure all children are wearing their belts before moving off, and most drivers will do. But honestly, how many children will keep their belts on for the entire duration of the journey? Not many I bet, it's far more fun to wedge the seat belts down the side of the seat, or ti
2

FFOC Teribus,

Hawick 09/05/2008 19:48:05
{continuation (must have ran out of space!)}

... Not many I bet, it's far more fun to wedge the seat belts down the side of the seat, or tie them into a knot, or in many cases, vandalise them (another cost of the upkeep of seatbelt buses is the regular vandalism of the belts themselves as well as the disfigurement and removal of crash paddings).

I just feel that the Lanton residents who are making a fuss about this should perhaps take a step back and take a breath. The chances of children being involved in an accident while travelling to school on a bus are VERY remote, regardless of whether that vehicle has seat belts or not. As mentioned, a small local company are providing a seat belted vehicle for all but one of the school weeks in the year is very commendable for any company, let alone a small locally run operation.

However, on a very final note, perhaps a suggestion to Munros: Perhaps the management at Munros should look into reshuffling the MoT rota so that these seatbelted vehicles that are designated for use on school contracts come up for MoT during the school summer holidays. This would save a repeat of this unusual circumstance.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Holyrood is due to debate a bill lodged by MSP Jeremy Purvis called 'Dying with Dignity'.Is this a bid to legalise euthanasia by the back door, or a welcome attempt to discuss an important subject?
It's a back door bid
No, it's about time the subject was properly debated

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.