Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Time MSPs pulled plug on railway project



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

In 2002 the cost of the return of the Waverley rail line to Tweedbank was £195million – currently, this stands at £295million, an increase of £100million in six years.
The railway is not due to be completed until 2013 and I shudder to think what the cost will be then. At 30 miles between Edinburgh Waverley and Tweedbank, the line costs a staggering £9,833,333 per mile; at 35 miles, £8,400,000 per mile.
How much lo
nger are our MSPs going to allow costs to spiral upwards before they blow the whole idea of the railway's return out of the water?
Scottish Borders Council, the main sponsor of the line's return, levies £1,700 for every house which receives planning consent, which is causing much discontent among house builders. SBC's £8.7million share of the cost of the railway's return will come from housing developers – but with the current housing slump, the council's contribution is bound to suffer.
Council leader David Parker says the £8.7million will be paid over a 30-year period – first payment in 2013.
There are SBC elections in 2011/12 – I wonder how many councillors who have dreamt up the idea of the return of the railway will survive?
The current administration at Newtown St Boswells has said there will be no increase in Council Tax as a result of the line's return. However, with the housing slump, will SBC still be able to find the £8.7million without an increase in Council Tax?

JAMIE BATTEN
Chay Blyth Place
Hawick



The full article contains 263 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2008 7:48 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Borders
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think Borderers are doing enough about the controversial proposals to our Post Offices?
Yes: we can have our say at the public meetings and lobby our MPs and MSPs
No: we really need to stand up and let the Government know that these cuts won't be tolerated
No sure

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.